Recent Question/Assignment

Subject Title Ethics, Sustainability and Profit
Subject Code MGT301A
Assessment Title Assessment One – Individual Report
Graduate Capabilities ? Capable of implementing sustainable work practices.
? Innovative, ethical and critical thinkers with highly developed leadership and problem-solving skills.
? Effective communicators of knowledge and ideas within and across professional and cultural boundaries.
? Work ready with the intellectual rigour to make effective contributions to their discipline and/or profession.
? Able to work collaboratively within and across teams.
Learning Outcome/s a) Assess the relationship between ethics, sustainability and profit.
b) Evaluate diverse moral and ethical issues in a strategic capacity.
Assessment Type Individual Report
Weighting 30%
Word Count 1,500
Due Day Week 5 – deadline for submission 11.55 pm Sunday
Submission Type Turnitin ?
Format / Layout of Assessment Report:
ICMS Cover Page Table of Contents
Executive Summary
Introduction
Findings
Conclusion
Recommendations
Reference List
Appendices ?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
Page 1 of 3
Assessment Instructions This is an Individual Assessment for each individual team member and is designed to assess your progress in developing the ability to conduct a Situation Analysis on the Business Sustainability Goals of the organisation chosen by the group.
Each individual team member will submit a Situation Analysis Report focused on a different one of the following Business Sustainability
Goals of the chosen organisation –
? Ethics
? Sustainability
? Profit
? Customers
? Competition
The Report must include evidence of research to substantiate your conclusions and recommendations.
Deliverables
Individual students are required to submit their written Report of no more than 1,500 words to Turnitin in Week 5.
Important Instructions
This Assessment is to be completed by individual students and contributes 30% to the final grade for this course.
The word count limit is 1,500 words (plus or minus 10%), excluding Executive Summary, References and Appendices.
Times New Roman 12 point font and 1.5 line spacing.
APA referencing.
Header to contain student names and identifier numbers only.
Footer to contain page number only.
Plagiarism Declaration signed and attached as cover page.
Refer to and comply with, all the relevant requirements for a Business Report as listed in the ICMS Style Guide and particularly note the penalties that apply to non-compliance with the word count limit and late submission.
Readings for the Assessment Recommended readings as nominated in the Moodle weekly subject blocks.
Grading Criteria / Rubric A detailed Marking Rubric is attached below.
Page 2 of 3
MGT301A Assessment One – Individual Report
Student _______________________________________ Tutor ____________________ Grade _______
Criteria HD (85-100) D (75-84) CR
(65-74) PASS
(50-64) FAIL (0-49)
Content 40% Provides a clear, authoritative and indepth understanding of, and insight into, the situation analysis on business sustainability goals. Highly focused and coherently integrates examples from the course readings and/or other research, evidencing deep analysis with rich discussion. Provides a very good understanding of the situation analysis on business sustainability goals. Well focused with analysis and discussion mostly based on examples from course readings with some other research. Provides a reasonable grasp of the situation analysis on business sustainability goals. Shows focus and demonstrates evidence of some analysis but is mostly description or summary based on course readings. Provides a basic to limited grasp of the situation analysis on business sustainability goals. Lacks focus and tends to represent the work of others without making significant additions. Very limited or no real indication that learning has occurred in relation to the situation analysis on business sustainability goals. Does not provide materials relevant to the topic.
Presentation
of Ideas
20% Provides an in-depth analysis of the real-world example, underpinned by relevant, current theory and tools.
Presentation of information and ideas are structured logically and are highly related to the subject matter. Many original, stimulating and thought provoking ideas are expressed and communicated clearly. Provides a very good analysis of the real-world example, underpinned by relevant, current theory and tools. Presentation of information and ideas are structured logically. Articulates several original ideas which are relevant to the subject matter. Provides a reasonable analysis of the real-world example, underpinned by some relevant, current theory and tools. Presentation of information and ideas are structured logically however, may not always be on point. Ideas are mostly original but may lack focus regarding the subject matter. Provides a basic to limited analysis of the real-world example, underpinned by some theory and tools. Presentation of information and ideas can be followed but may lack logical structure. The
ideas expressed are satisfactory but not original and are loosely connected to discussions around the subject matter. Very limited or no analysis of the realworld example. Insufficiently underpinned by theory and tools. Information and ideas presented are not original, often confused and are not connected to discussions around the subject matter.
Interaction
Conclusions
Recommendations
20% Clear, insightful and excellent conclusions and recommendations that demonstrate highly developed critical thinking capabilities. Frequently acknowledges the contributions of others. Very good conclusions and recommendations that are very well
expressed and demonstrate very good critical thinking capabilities. Mostly acknowledges the contributions of others. Good conclusions and
recommendations that demonstrate good critical thinking capabilities. Usually acknowledges the contributions of others. Satisfactory conclusions and recommendations that are not well expressed and demonstrate limited critical thinking capabilities. Seldom acknowledges the contributions of others. Poor conclusions and
recommendations that are poorly
expressed and demonstrate inadequate critical thinking capabilities. Rarely acknowledges the contributions of others.
Mechanics
Grammar
10% Writing is clear, concise, and particularly well organised with excellent sentence and paragraph construction. Thoughts are excellently expressed in a coherent and logical manner. There are no spelling, grammar, or syntax errors evident. Writing is clear, concise, and very well organised with very good sentence and paragraph construction. Thoughts are very well expressed in a coherent and logical manner. Some minor spelling, grammar, or syntax errors are evident. Writing is mostly clear, concise, and well organised with good sentence and paragraph construction. Thoughts are mostly expressed in a coherent and logical manner. There are several spelling, grammar, or syntax errors evident. Writing is unclear and/or disorganised. Thoughts are not expressed in a coherent and logical manner. There are significant spelling, grammar or syntax errors evident. Writing is unclear and disorganised.
Thoughts ramble and make little sense. There are numerous spelling, grammar, or syntax errors throughout the report.
Sources
Citations
References
10% All the sources are academically credible. Citations and references are in the correct APA format as per the ICMS Style Guide. Most sources are from credible, scholarly materials. Minor errors in citations and referencing as per the
APA format of the ICMS Style Guide. Some sources are from credible, scholarly materials. Some citation and referencing errors are not in keeping with the APA format of the ICMS Style Guide. Few sources are from credible, scholarly materials. Significant citation and referencing errors are not in keeping with the APA format of the ICMS Style Guide. Sources lack scholarly credibility. Citations and referencing are not in keeping with the APA format of the ICMS Style Guide.
Page 3 of 3

Looking for answers ?


Recent Questions